Article Categories

By daybreak
Published: July 2, 2008
Print    Email

On June 16, 2005, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez announced a formal determination that the Massachusetts shellfish fishery is in a commercial failure triggered by a massive red tide bloom in the New England region. The determination came in response to a June 10, 2005, letter from Governor Mitt Romney requesting disaster assistance for the hard hit Massachusetts shellfish industry.

The action was made through a provision of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and covers the molluscan shellfish fishery in state waters and Atlantic surf clam and ocean quahogs in federal waters.

"We are taking action now because of the serious economic effects of this red tide disaster," Secretary Gutierrez said. In his letter, he indicated that it is not known how long the fishery resource disaster might continue or what the longer-term economic and social effects might be.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) took emergency action to close a portion of federal waters off the coasts of New Hampshire and Massachusetts to the harvest of all species of shellfish, with the exception of scallop meats, due to the spread of toxic algal blooms(red tide).

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested NOAA Fisheries Service take the immediate action on the fishery closure because the severity of the illness
associated with Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) that can result from eating contaminated shellfish. PSPS is considered to be a serious health threat. Red tide algae bloom produces marine biotoxins that cause PSP. The algae blooms create a neurotoxin that accumulates in filter-feeding shellfish and other parts of the marine food web.

The Massachusetts Marine Fisheries Division had already halted the harvesting of all shellfish within state waters along the Massachusetts coast from the New
Hampshire border to the Island of Martha’s Vineyard.

"Harmful algal blooms are a serious human health threat and are economically damaging to communities," said retired Navy Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr.,Ph.D., under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator. Monitoring efforts assist states in maintaining a safe and plentiful
seafood supply by allowing targeted closures."

NOAA officials went on to clarify that commercially available seafood is safe to eat, and that residents and visitors to the region should follow the guidelines offered by local officials.

 source: NOAA Fisheries Service press release

Submit Article